foAudits handheld use in Utilities Fundamental Objects, Inc. (FO) is a software development consulting firm working in the energy field. With our initial offering in 1998, we were the first company integrating pda (handheld) and web-based energy applications. foAudits is now in use for lighting, energy and water audits; for both residential as well as commercial applications. Our largest application has 1,964 users syncing on a daily basis. These applications use laptops, tablets, netbooks and handheld devices. In the handheld space, we have worked with Symbian, Palm, Windows Mobile and the Google Android OS. The Major Handheld Platforms
Because of the highly competitive nature of utilities, one of the services that we offer is to closely guard the nature, content and implementation of each customer's audit system. However, at a high level, here are the platforms that we use (and why): Device versus Operating System While there are many variables affecting what device to use, there are really two initial ways to break this down. The choice of Hardware Device, such as Laptop, Netbook, Tablet, PDA (disconnected devices) and Smartphones (PDAs integrated into phones). After that distinction, comes the choice of Operating System platform to pick; such as Windows Mobile or WebOS. Everything, from available feature set to cost, comes into play as decision point factors. But, focusing just on handhelds, here is what we look for:
Auditors will likely be carrying flashlights, thermal sensors, chalk or tools; so the easier that the device is to operate with one hand, the better. The large screen area is important, so that the most audit information as possible can be on any given screen without the user having to move between pages. A touch screen, with optional stylus input is important, so that the user does not have to work the keys unnecessarily to input data -- this turns out to be an important request. The cost of connectivity (the wireless plan) is important; especially when a large number of auditors are involved. The monthly wireless charges will soon accumulate to be much more than the costs of the devices themselves. WiFi connectivity helps so that the customer can sync data back and forth to the web/database without having to incur wireless charges. While the software keypads, like on the iPhone, have become better they still are not as easy to use as a hardware thumbpad keypad on a Palm Treo, or the pull-out keyboards, like on the AT&T Fuze. It does not take long for someone to use the hardware keyboard approach to appreciate the difference. Customer-specific requests, like being able to read bar-codes; read RFID tags, or hook to temperature sensors often tip the balance one way or the other. More on the Individual Devices note: The basic growth in use of the platform is shown with an up arrow (for growing); sideways for about the same; or a down arrow for dropping in requests.
Now promoting a new OS (WebOS on the Palm Pre) they are trying to make a comeback through aggressive marketing; but the tools are not there on the current platform.
Windows Mobile, which has gone through many changes (including product names: Windows CE, Pocket PC, Windows Mobile) was the largest challenger to Palm in the PDA market until the last two years. Windows Mobile though is under some pressure, especially from the Android devices. Adding to this are companies like Palm (in 2009) and Motorola (in 2010) dropping Windows Mobile use on their respective hardware devices.
Blackberry (RIM)'s strength is in email and corporate applications. While popular, the implementation of development tools across the various Blackberry devices is very inconsistent, and it is difficult to program on. This leads to smaller, less significant applications in use on Blackberries. Until recently, RIM hand no touchscreen devices; and the screens are smaller than most other platforms.
Much in the same position as the Blackberry, the iPhone is extremely popular. While there are thousands of applications for the iPhone, most of them are games or curiosity applications. The high cost of the overall iPhone solution (including the highest wireless data plan costs), plus the limitations on how applications can be developed slow the iPhone's business penetration. The software keyboard, while interesting to use, is not foolproof. As of Sept 2009, we have not had a utility customer request an iPhone implementation.
The latest Android devices, stand as a look and feel competitor to the iPhone, without the overall high cost and difficulty of development. Based on an open-source Linux operating system (like the PalmPre) -- the per unit licensing issues of Windows Mobile are removed as well. Initially hampered by Microsoft efforts to quell adoption of Android, many hardware vendors, such as HTC are now adding significant Android support.
The greatest number of smartphones in the world run the Symbian OS. That is its key drawing point. Coming in at more of a phone-first perspective, with generally small screens and phone keypad-only data entry, as well as a lack of integration points with backend systems, holds Symbian back.
For Additional Information |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||